Today in Digital Marketing

Breaking Down Blocklists: Context Over Keywords

Apr 21, 2023 | Industry Articles

"

Today in Digital Marketing

Last month, I stumbled upon a marketing goldmine. 

It was a bunch of programming code from a video game I play called Slay the Spire. It's sort of a card game. 

The code I found online was for its leaderboard. You remember these — play Pacman, get a high score, and you can put your initials in. (I'm aware I'm dating myself with that reference, thank you.)

With Slay the Spire, though, you can put your whole name in if you want. Or your username. Or really any words you want.

And that's the problem. You know the saying: Give the Internet an inch, and it'll take it vile.

The code was a list of bad words that the game would block from usage in the leaderboard. Profanity, racial slurs, and sexual references. Even common words like camgirl, OMG, and — my favourite — Santorum. Spelled like the American politician, though you might want to Google that word… if you don't have a weak stomach.

The list was a goldmine for me, because I run a social media engagement and moderation agency. And it provided more words we could add to our existing list of full-service and client-specific blockwords.

In the media buying world, blocklists are used too: Terms and topics that the advertiser doesn't want to appear next to.

And an interesting piece up on Digiday suggests that keyword blocklists may be doing more harm than good.  

❌ The Problem with Blocklists 

Experts say these lists often reward soft content while penalizing socially relevant and controversial topics, such as hard news, leading to missed opportunities for brands and depriving publishers of revenue from premium audiences. It can also create roadblocks for diverse advertising featuring underrepresented groups.

⛔ Moving Beyond the Blocklist 

The piece is definitely worth reading — it says advertisers must challenge themselves, their media buying partners, and their brand safety vendors to create ways to avoid punishing hard news.

Quoting the piece: 

Consumers are smart. They know what they are getting into when they visit hard news sites. If they see a story about a violent protest on a reputable news site, they will not think that a brand advertising on that site is violent. Blocking all news stories covering violence is too crude an approach to brand safety.

🎙 Dive Deeper...

You have been reading an abbreviated version of a story we covered recently on the Today in Digital Marketing podcast. Thousands of marketers listen to the daily show. You should join them.

📧 Prefer Email?

We’ve got you covered. We publish a daily email newsletter, covering all the day’s developments in social media, SEO, online advertising, and digital marketing. You can even get each Friday’s issue free!

Follow Us

About the Podcast

Every weekday, Tod Maffin brings you a fast-paced 8-minute rundown of what you missed in the world of digital marketing and social media. Thousands of senior marketers listen each day.

About the Host

Tod Maffin is a veteran tech-business journalist. He spent a decade as the National Technology Reporter for Canada’s public broadcaster, and has written for major publications like the New York Times, Globe and Mail, and more.

Besides hosting the podcast, Tod is president of engageQ digital, a social media engagement and moderation agency, and is author of several books, and spent 20+ years as a professional conference keynote speaker.

[more]

Get It By Email

Join the thousands of marketers who rely on this daily digest of the day's news in marketing, social media, SEO, and media buying.

Sent every weekday at 5pm ET.

Unsubscribe any time with a single click. Your information will never be shared.

Thank you! Please check your email to confirm.